How to Minimize the Risks of Septic Shock
Having to deal with septic shock can be very stressful and can be a very scary experience. You might not know what to do or where to start, but there are steps you can take to minimize the risks.
Diagnosis
Identifying septic patients with a high risk of organ dysfunction is a critical task in a mergency department. Early recognition and intervention contribute to reducing case-fatality rates in shock.
Despite its importance, the diagnosis of shock is not always straightforward. Patients with occult presentations may require a more precise approach. It is also important to assess the mechanisms of shock.
Sepsis, in addition to bacterial infections, is associated with viral diseases and protozoal infections. Infection sources can vary widely, depending on the country. In many areas of the world, the type of infecting microorganisms and the nature of the infection are different.
Sepsis is defined as life-threatening organ dysfunction, which is the result of the dysregulated host response to an acute infection. In patients with septic shock, the duration of hypotension before initiation of antimicrobial therapy is a critical determinant of survival.
Septic shock is classified into four categories: mild, moderate, severe, and life-threatening. A patient with septic shock has an arterial blood pressure below 65 mm Hg and a serum lactate level greater than 18 mg/dl. In order to treat septic shock, vasopressors are used to maintain 65 mm Hg.
The diagnostic algorithm for septic shock starts with the initial evaluation of etiology, followed by a consideration of local tissue injury, primary hemodynamic manifestations, and stabilization. Then, the treatment algorithm proceeds through optimization and de-escalation.
The Cooperative Antimicrobial Therapy of Septic Shock Database Research Group is a group that is renowned among intensive care unit practitioners. They have developed a database and provide the most robust evidence for time to antibiotics in septic shock.
The Surviving Sepsis Campaign has developed international guidelines for the management of septic shock. The recommendations have reduced mortality in many countries. However, more research is needed to understand how to improve outcomes in resource-limited settings.
Fluid resuscitation
During the first six hours of sepsis, fluid resuscitation is vital to increase cardiac output, increase intravascular volume, and improve tissue perfusion. However, the goals of fluid resuscitation in different stages of septic shock may differ. In the initial phase, the goal is to restore cardiac output and oxygen delivery, while later stages focus on improving tissue perfusion.
The Surviving Sepsis Guidelines are international standards for managing patients with sepsis. They recommend liberal fluid resuscitation. The guidelines also recommend generous hemodynamic endpoints, such as central venous oxygen saturation.
The Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV database included 11,263 individuals with sepsis. The trial was a randomized controlled study in which patients were randomized to either the usual care group or the structured resuscitation group. The standard resuscitation target was superior vena cava oxygen saturation, defined as 70 percent or greater.
In the structured resuscitation group, vasopressors were used differently. Vasoactive medications, including natriuretic peptides, cleave glycoproteins in the endothelial glycocalyx. These natriuretic peptides, which increase interstitial edema, can damage the endothelial glycocalyx, causing impaired endothelial function and impaired tissue perfusion.
A larger positive fluid balance during the first three hours of fluid resuscitation is associated with improved survival. In addition, a faster fluid resuscitation rate is associated with higher MAP, increased microcirculation, and decreased early inflammation.
In the USSM protocol, a patient’s macrocirculation hemodynamic parameter is compared to laboratory measures of fluid overload. This objective measurement is based on heart rate and blood pressure. This comparison allows for more accurate detection of excessive fluid intake and can prevent inappropriate therapy.
The ProCESS trial is a multicenter randomized clinical trial that compared two different resuscitation strategies for septic shock patients. One group received a fluid bolus and the other group was treated with a standardized protocol.
Pulse oximetry
Using a pulse oximeter is a standard monitoring device in critical care. However, studies have shown that the accuracy of pulse oximetry for septic shock can be compromised by four clinical conditions.
The authors of this study examined the accuracy of pulse oximetry for a group of patients with severe sepsis. The primary outcome was the magnitude of the difference between SpO2 and sO2(a). The researchers evaluated the accuracy of sO2(a) in 88 patients who had severe sepsis. They also investigated whether vasoactive drugs were associated with lower accuracy of sO2(a).
The authors found that the measurement error of the pulse oximeter was inversely associated with systolic blood pressure (HR) and diastolic blood pressure (BP). A lower HR or diastolic BP may affect thresholds used in early warning scores. A decreased arterial blood signal can cause irregular SpO2 readings and result in dropouts.
There was a higher incidence of hidden hypoxemia among Asian and black patients. In addition, the authors noted a trend toward increased short-term organ dysfunction and in-hospital mortality among patients who were exposed to hidden hypoxemia.
In this study, 87,971 patients in 5 databases were analyzed. The study population consisted of patients who had been admitted to a critical care unit. Each patient had a paired arterial blood gas (ABG) and pulse oximetry measurement performed during the same period. The ABG results were then compared to the pulse oximetry results.
A comparison of the paired results showed that the standard deviation of sO2(a) for non-hypoxemic patients was 3.1 %. This was not a significant difference when compared to the mean difference. Nevertheless, 50 % of the hypoxemic patients would not have been considered hypoxemic by sO2(a) measurement.
Treatment with antibiotics
Managing severe sepsis requires a comprehensive approach to treatment with antibiotics. It involves diagnosis, collection of samples, and management of the infection. A physician may also perform imaging scans to confirm an infection.
The most important factor in the management of sepsis is the timing of the administration of antimicrobials. For decades, the standard was to give fluids and antibiotics immediately after the initial diagnosis. But studies have shown that the risk of mortality increases for each hour of delay.
The PHANTASi trial compared early treatment with delayed treatment in patients with septic shock. The researchers included a group of critically ill sepsis patients with two of the three SIRS criteria. They found that a reduction in the time to antibiotics of 96 minutes lowered mortality. Interestingly, septic shock patients in the PHANTASi trial did not have a significantly higher mortality rate than the control group. However, it remains to be determined whether patients with septic shock benefit from the use of antibiotics earlier in the treatment process.
In addition to the PHANTASi trial, there are many other studies examining the effectiveness of early antibiotics in septic shock. A recent systematic review by Sterling et al. identified 11 observational studies analyzing the relationship between the timing of antibiotic administration and in-hospital mortality. They concluded that there is no difference in mortality rates between the groups. The study also included data from 35,000 patients in an emergency department (ED) cohort.
In order to prevent unnecessary antibiotics, experts recommend an integrative strategy that includes rational empirical antimicrobial therapy. This strategy should include an early reassessment of the bacteria responsible for the infection, clinical status, prior history of the patient, and the use of written protocols.
Complications
Getting medical care for septic shock is crucial. It is a serious condition that has a high mortality rate. This condition is caused by a variety of bacteria. If you are exposed to an infection, you are likely to develop septic shock.
Septic shock occurs when the body’s immune system becomes overwhelmed and fails to control the infection. The result is organ dysfunction. Some people may lose all four limbs. Others may need dialysis to remove toxins from their blood.
Septic shock is most commonly caused by gram-positive bacteria. It is a life-threatening condition that can be prevented by cleaning and medicating open wounds. Vaccinations are also a good way to prevent septic shock.
In addition, patients are at an increased risk for developing septic shock if they have chronic diseases or have undergone surgery. Other risk factors include genetic disorders, chronic respiratory conditions, and immune system problems.
Sepsis is usually treated with antibiotics. These medications are administered immediately after diagnosis. A medical professional may also administer oxygen delivery, corticosteroids, and other treatments. The treatment plan is based on the likely pathogens, the patient’s response to treatment, and the severity of the condition. If the infection is refractory to antibiotics, additional therapies may be considered.
Septic shock is the most severe stage of sepsis. Symptoms include low blood pressure, rapid heart rate, fever, and hypothermia. The main complications of septic shock are respiratory failure, kidney failure, and heart failure.
Patients who develop septic shock are typically admitted to the hospital. They are monitored in lower-acuity wards. If blood pressure is stable, they are discharged. However, patients who develop septic shock may require dialysis to clear the toxins from their blood.
Health Sources:
Health A to Z. (n.d.). HSE.ie. https://www2.hse.ie/az/
U.S. National Library of Medicine. (n.d.). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
Directory Health Topics. (n.d.). https://www.healthline.com/directory/topics
Health A-Z. (2022, April 26). Verywell Health. https://www.verywellhealth.com/health-a-z-4014770
Harvard Health. (2015, November 17). Health A to Z. https://www.health.harvard.edu/health-a-to-z
Health Conditions A-Z Sitemap. (n.d.). EverydayHealth.com. https://www.everydayhealth.com/conditions/
